Cannabis discourse is full of confident claims on both sides. Our only loyalty is to study quality — not to outcomes.
Convergent evidence: controlled trials, systematic reviews, or long-established pharmacology.
Consistent human data with real limitations — direction is clear, magnitude is not.
Early or small human studies. Interesting, not settled.
Studies point in different directions, or causality is unresolved.
Grades are revisited as new systematic reviews appear. When high-quality evidence contradicts a fact, we change the fact — the correction log is the point of the site.